Showing posts with label willie randolph. Show all posts
Showing posts with label willie randolph. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

The Other Shoe....

.... needs to drop soon.

Either Willie Randolph and the Mets will show themselves to be something more than a .500 team or the Wilpons will act decisively to save a season that started with great promise. 

The specter of the Mets playing .500 baseball and falling in the National League's second division must worry the image-conscious ownership which has established a new sports network and must be looking for serious momentum with the imminent opening of Citi Field.

Willie managed to play the race card, insult the owners of his team as well as the Mets' faithful.  

The options for ownership are not at all appealing.  Firing Randolph and looking to move high priced veterans would be a disastrous pre-Memorial Day white flag.  Moreover, the chips the Mets possess are less than stellar.  An overpriced, overmatched Carlos Delgado, a brittle Moises Alou ... a enigmatic Aaron Heilman ... what else is there?

Staying the course with Willie, however, might be equally as disastrous.  Think about it.  An angry, brooding Randolph content to go down with the ship as any good skipper might make for great Daily News fodder or Post headlines, but could do immeasurable damage to the collective psyche of Mets Nation.  

A somber Jose Reyes or a oft-questioned David Wright is not something that any member of the organization could stand.  Moreover, is Johann Santana willing to put aside his seeming prickly nature to answer the growing questions about his inability to keep the ball in cavernous Shea Stadium?

Dark days at Shea approach.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Things I don't understand...

There are several sport things I don't understand:

lacrosse, the rules of field hockey, why Willie Randolph never double switches especially when it'd be particularly beneficial for his team... and horse racing.

After reading this artcle by Chad Forde from espn.com, I'm even more confused. I mean, if you did this to other animals, you'd be pilloried. Can you imagine a goat or monkey race? I'm also confused by the use of specifically "human" adjectives to describe horses.